Anticipatory Bail Format in Punjab and Haryana High Court

                            Anticipatory Bail Application



              IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF PANJAB AND HARYANA  

                                                                            CRM-M no. ...... of 2017


Raju S/o Shyam R/o Mani Majra
Surendra S/o Sita Prasad R/o Sec 27 D, Chandigarh
 

…..Applicants/Petitioners

                                  Versus



State of Chandigarh


     …..Respondent



                              Application Under Section 438For Grant of                 
                             Anticipatory Bail in Case FIR No. 345 Under Section                                498A, 406IPC

Respectfully Showeth:


1- That the respondent has registered the above mentioned case against the applicant/petitioner.

2- That the applicant/petitioner has no nexus or connection with the above-mentioned offence.

3- That the applicant/accused is a resident of India as Engineer is aged about 42 years.

4- That the applicant/petitioners have not caused any hurt/injury to any one.

5- That the allegations in the FIR as alleged by the respondents  are wrong, incorrect and concocted story made by the complainant.

6- That no recovery is pending in the above mentioned case and nothing is to be recovered from the applicant/petitioner.

7- That the applicant/petitioner undertakes to join the investigation as and when required by the police of police Station Sector 19 chandigarh.

8- That there is no apprehension for absconding or evading of taking trial.

9- That the applicant/petitioner undertakes not to temper with the evidence or witnesses.

10- That the applicant/petitioner undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions as imposed by the Hon’ble court in the event of bail.

11- That the applicant/petitioner undertakes for not to hamper the bail and ready to furnish the bail bonds of sound amount for the satisfaction of the Hon’ble court.

12- That in such type of false cases the bail is rule and refusal of the bail will not serve any purpose.

PRAYER:

It is, therefore prayed that the applicant/petitioner may kindly be released/granted anticipatory bail and the SHO concerned of concerned police station Sector 19 C may kindly be directed to release the applicant/petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest


Dated:     
Applicant/Petitioner


Through counsel:
____ Advocate, ____
Location: Capitol Complex, Sector 1, Chandigarh, 160001, India

Comments

  1. shashank jain27 January 2019 at 01:03


    Global Jurist is the Top Law Firm in Chandigarh . Contact the best Best advocate in chandigarh for dedicated and loyal legal representation.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Limitation for Impleading LR or Legal Representative

It is clear, therefore, that if after the filing of an execution petition in time, the decree-holder dies and his legal representatives do not come on record - or the judgment-debtor dies and his legal representatives are not brought on record, then there is no abatement of the execution petition. If there is no abatement, the position in the eye of law is that the execution petition remains pending on the file of the execution court. If it remains pending and if no time limit is prescribed to bring the legal representatives on record, in execution proceedings, it is open in case of death of the decree-holder, for his legal representative to come on record at any time. The execution application cannot even be dismissed for default behind the back of the decree-holder's legal representatives. In case of death of the judgment-debtor, the decree- holder could file an application to bring the legal representatives of the judgment-debtor on record, at any time. Of course, in case of de...
Read more

Provision rent judgement

R.C. Lahoti, J. Late Parmodh Paul, who died during the pendency of the proceedings and whose legal representatives, the appellants before us, have been brought on record, filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictions Act, 1949 (hereinafter 'the Act', for short), against the respondent-firm through its two partners on the ground of the tenants having defaulted in payment of rent, a ground for eviction under Clause (i) of sub-Section (2) of Section 13 of the Act. Hereinafter for the sake of convenience and brevity, Late Parmodh Paul shall be referred to as the 'landlord' and the respondents as the 'tenants'. According to the averments made in the petition for eviction filed on 17.9.1991, the suit premises were obtained by the tenants on tenancy from Shri Mani Ram and Smt. Ratan Devi, the then owners and landlords, under the rent note dated 20-9-1982. The rate of rent agreed upon was Rs.2000/- ...
Read more